January 25th, 2012 (#1008)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through the Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan 25th, 2012:

Programmable Perspective of Collective:

"Ever Tried to Think? Go On Take the Plunge,
Remember, Media is Disinfo, You're the Sponge,
Opinions can Be Altered by Remote Indoctrination,
Make You Passive or Angry, Persuasion-Activation,
Take a Time-Out from TV, Find Out Who You Are,
Part of a Collective, Or Independent Star?
Do You Go Along to Get Along, Fear of Rejection
By the Indoctrinated Mass, Leading to Dejection,
Truth Demands Free-Falling, No Guaranteed Landing,
This Path Less Travelled, Will Give You Understanding"
© Alan Watt Jan 25th, 2012


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – Jan 25th, 2012  (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

alternate sites:
cuttingthroughthematrix.net  ,   .us  ,   .ca

mirror site:
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:

Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check – in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 25th of January, 2012.  For newcomers, I always suggest that you make use, while it’s still up, the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and you’ll find hundreds and hundreds, actually over a thousand audios for free download.  And hopefully, by the time you’ve finished, if you’ve still got hair on your head, you’ll understand the big system that went into action, over a century ago, actually, longer than that, but a century, as far as their own publications come out to the public, if they want to read them, that is.  And basically planned to take over the world, bring in a scientific type of dictatorship society, authoritarian.  Some of them call it technocratic.  There’s other names for it too, and basically where an elite, an established elite, very, very wealthy elite, would simply run the world, using experts for everything, instead of this messy thing called democracy, where the public think they’re getting to vote in somebody that’s going to stand up for them, which never has happened anyway.  But that’s the reality of it.  And, of course, when you have that kind of money, and you can hire thousands of think tanks to work on all social issues, you can certainly make things happen.  All the NGOs, armies of NGOs, non-governmental organizations, which protest government and so on, you can buy them all, create them all, in fact, and give them even life-long pensions when they retire.  So, you really have these people working full-time to bring in the system that we are basically seeing coming into fruition today. 


This is the next part of the New World Order, of course, getting towards their global Utopia, where they’re bringing down the population, which they planned an awful long time ago, and made sure it would happen, since most folk in the West, definitely the males, are almost sterile.  And, of course, we’re supposed to think that’s just some, in fact, there’s not even an inquiry, there’s no inquiry into this, like why are they becoming?  “Oh, I don’t know.”  You know.  The UN gives us the statistics every year but doesn’t add on that this should be a crisis situation.  It’s not a crisis, because it was planned that way, you see.  Same with the cancers.  And that’s the bad news. 


Anyway, help yourself to cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and remember too that they carry transcripts as well, for print-up on all the sites.  If you want transcripts in other languages, go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, and help yourselves.  You are the audience that bring me to you.  You can help me keep going by buying the books and discs I have on the website, and from the US to Canada, you can always order using personal check, or send cash, or you can use PayPal, or an international postal money order from the post office.  Just say an international postal money order.  Same price as a regular one, I believe.  And across the world you’ve got Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal once again. 


I try and chronicle the events and show you the history behind this matrix you’re living in today that you think is all real, and to show you how you got your opinions.  Every generation is given its opinions, especially towards demanding things which the elite want them to demand.  And they can really screw up your head, because, when you start to wake up and realize you’ve been in the Greenies or whatever the particular thing was that was being pushed at the time, you become angry and aggressive and you tend to turn on people, and then yourself as well, for being conned and brainwashed.  It’s not nice to find out you’ve been brainwashed, but every generation is for their particular task, that the elite have in mind for them. 


Today, they’re bringing up the radical Greenies at school today, who literally will be like the Stasi or the Communist system, where you cannot talk to them when they’re dressed in their official uniforms coming to your door, because you burned a piece of wood or whatever it happened to be.  And it’s going to be hell on earth very shortly.  Already is, technically, since they brought in a war situation across the world, exactly what the Green Party said they wanted years ago, we should bring in a war situation and get the people to consume less.  That’s now called austerity.  I’ll touch on that tonight in one of these articles.  We’re going through a planned agenda.  I hope everyone does realize that.  Nothing is happening on any front by chance.  Back with more, after this break.


Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix.  And, you know, you can prove anything by studies.  For every study that says one thing, you’ll find another study that says another thing.  And of course, in fact, recently, and I’ll put it up tonight, there was a guy who was doing all the studies for the benefits of wine.  And they were doing it for different associations.  You can remember years ago, every year, everybody would have a baited breath waiting for the heart and stroke foundation to publish its findings, and it would say, oh, red wine is good for you.  And then, a year later it would say, oh, well, it could be bad in some circumstances.  And they went back and forth about this wine stuff.  Well, they found out that the guy who did all the studies was just making the stuff up.  And he’s been charging an awful lot of money.  And he turned in 60,000 pages of absolute nothing, rubbish that just came out of his imagination.  And folk should have realized that, I hope, a long time ago, it was obviously rubbish.  And he was getting grants for all this, of course, and making a good living for himself, just printing up rubbish.  Because they’re so profuse now, studies.  There’s just studies on everything, multiple studies being done across the world on the same subjects even, that will all contradict each other.  It depends what agenda is being pushed you see. 


And of course, the present generation who’s in school today have to grow up with austerity and a lower population as well.  That’s part of it.  So, you’ll see these articles, just popping out of course, since the media is all controlled by the same group that runs all the different studies and gets the right answers, you know.  And it says:


Abortion safer than giving birth:


(Alan: It says:)




(A: And it says:)


Getting a legal abortion is much safer than giving birth, suggests a new U.S. study published Monday.


(A: I read something very similar, about a year ago, probably from the same bunch.)


Researchers found that women were about 14 times more likely to die during or after giving birth to a live baby than to die from complications of an abortion.


(A: And then it goes on to say experts say, and experts this, and experts that.  All the usual stuff that they’d talked about.  They’d train us all to believe in experts.)


The message is that getting an abortion and giving birth are both safe, said Dr. Anne Davis, who studies obstetrics and gynecology at the Columbia University Medical Center in New York, and wasn't involved in the new study.


(A: So, she goes on to tell that they’re both basically safe and so on.  And then you just scroll down.  And then you find it goes right back into, oh, it’s safer to have an abortion, yadda, yadda, yah.  It says:)


The researchers on the new study combined government data on live births and pregnancy- and abortion-related deaths with estimates on legal abortions performed in the U.S. from the Guttmacher Institute, which conducts sexual and reproductive health research and education.


Well, if you look into that institute, that will tell you all you need to know as to why the study is actually out there and what their agenda is.  So, they also talk about the different pill that a lot of girls take now for abortions, and yadda, yadda, yadda, yah.  But it’s just not true that it’s all that safe, because there’s a lot of complications that come out of abortion as well.  An awful lot of complications actually.  And it’s bad for the child too, mind you. 


And then this article here as well, that ties in with this, because these articles are not unrelated.  They’ll come out maybe in the same paper or different papers, or bits on the news, you know.  And you think they’re all unassociated, but they’re actually very much associated with each other.  And this article here says.


Brave New World: UK ethicist wants women to abandon motherhood, use artificial wombs


(A: And at first, I thought, that would be awful painful.  But, no, it’s an external womb they’re talking about here.  And again, it’s from this particular woman who belongs to an association, very up-there association that wants us all to have less children too.  It says:)


NORWICH, U.K., January 23, 2012


In remarks that critics have said are disturbingly reminiscent of Aldous Huxley’s famous dystopian novel “Brave New World,” a UK ethicist


(A: I guess we’re all ethicists in some way.)


has argued that since pregnancy causes “natural inequality” between the sexes,


(A: Yep, natural inequality.)


women must be liberated from the “burdens and risks of pregnancy” through the use of “ectogenesis”, or artificial wombs.


(A: It says.  Eh?)


“Pregnancy is a condition that causes pain and suffering, and that affects only women.


(A: You can tell she’s up there.  She’s a doctor, you know.)


The fact that men do not have to go through pregnancy to have a genetically related child, whereas women do, is a natural inequality,” writes Dr. Anna Smajdor in an article that recently appeared in the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.


In her Defense of Ectogenesis, published online December, 2011, Smajdor construes pregnancy as a “medical problem,


(A: Like an illness.  It’s an illness, folk.  You understand, we’re all the results of illnesses.)


along with other conditions that cause pain and suffering.” Smajdor is Lecturer in Ethics at the School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice


(A: Guess what university?)


 in the University of East Anglia.


(A: You know.  Oh, there’s too many people.  Oh, they’re warming up the planet.  They’ve all got to die, except us.  We’re too special.)


“If there were a disease that caused symptoms and risks similar to those caused by pregnancy, I contend that it would be regarded as being fairly serious, and that we would have good reasons to try to insure against it,” argues Smajdor, who lumps pregnancy along with “diseases” that continue for many months, such as the measles.


For Smajdor, currently “men reap all the benefits of women’s gestation, while women bear the risks and burdens.”


Accordingly, in Smajdor’s worldview, “women are disadvantaged as a group through brute luck, because men can reproduce without undergoing the risks of pregnancy.”


My God.  She’s definitely an expert eh?  She knows that men don’t get pregnant generally.  They’re working on that too. 


But anyway, you read this kind of article, and it’s just hate, hate, hate, hate, hate.  Remember too, that in the higher system of the elite, they talk about, like the Masons do, they say that they want to perfect that which was left imperfect, you see.  And this is all part of it as well.  And, but she goes on and on, and prattles on about how terrible it is to be a woman, and all that stuff, and nature is all unfair.  It’s all unfair.  And we’ve got to change the world, because she personally feels it’s all unfair, you know.  This is the nuts that you get out there, but they’re picked up by the big associations.  And then, you have to go in, you see, to find out who backs her.  Who’s backing her?  You see.  And you’ll find all her stuff, on what she says is backing her.  But then you have to go into other stuff of people she knows and works with her and sponsors her.  And this is a person, Ruth Deech, she’s called, Baroness Deech.   I could construe that last word, to make it fit in with the topic, but I won’t.  And it says here:


Ruth Lynn Deech,


(A: I think her name is really Franklin or something.)


Baroness Deech,


(A: It says.  Fraenkel was actually her maiden name.  And daddy and all the rest of them escaped from the awful Nazis to Britain, and really pushed Communism, pretty, pretty well.  Anyway, it says here, that this is the one that’s backing her on this stuff.  And then you go into the story of how Deech basically is a lawyer, and:)


She returned to the college in 1970 to be a tutorial fellow in Law, a job she retained until 1991 when she was elected principal of the college.


(A: I mean, she really got up there fast, you know.)


She retired in 2004, and was succeeded by Tim Gardam. The college has since named its latest building after her; the Ruth Deech Building, the fourth to be named for a principal.


Deech held many other positions during her career; she served as Senior Proctor of the University of Oxford between 1985 and 1986, as a member of the University's Hebdomadal Council of the UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority....


(A: You understand, this is all to do with eugenics, folks.  Eugenics.  Socialists are really into eugenics.  You have to go into the Fabian Society.  You understand, most folk think that Socialists are all about the workers’ rights and things like that.  No, no.  The big organizations that run the Socialist Movement and the Science of Socialism, which is to do, again, with Marxism, is when they look around, they see so many unemployed poor people, and their idea is not to get them to work.  Their idea is to eliminate them, and then the problem is gone.  The planned society.  So, anyway, this woman seemed to just be awfully favored by the gods.  And she got up there.  She was on the BBC.  Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.  And then she was:)


...made a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (DBE), in recognition of her work at the HFEA.


After leaving St. Anne's, Deech was appointed the first Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education


(A: So, here she is, making sure she’s helping to make the education policies and indoctrination for the children.)


On 22 July 2005, it was announced by the House of Lords Appointments Commission that she would be made a life peer, sitting as a Crossbencher.


(A: That must be kind of hard on the gluteus maximus.)


On 5 October 2005, she was created Baroness Deech, of Cumnor in the County of Oxfordshire,


(A: They make these things up for them, these titles.)


and introduced in the House of Lords.


She delivered her maiden speech on 24 November 2005.


(A: And then it says:)


In 1999, The Observer newspaper named her as the 107th most powerful


(A: Now, listen to this.  This is the one that ties in with the woman who was pushing for ectogenesis, right, and co-wrote a book with her.  It says:)


the 107th most powerful person in Britain, and in 2001, Deech was placed at no.26 in Channel 4's "The God List"


(A: It’s called.  How do you like that, eh?  The God List.  So, Fraenkel made it up to “The God List.”)


which ranked "the fifty people of faith in Britain who exercise the most power and influence over our lives". In November 2007, Deech published IVF [In Vitro Fertilization] to Immortality: Controversy in the Era of Reproductive Technology, with co-author


(A: And here she is again:)


Anna Smajdor.


(A: The one that wants external wombs for women.)


Deech is currently the Professor of Law at Gresham College in London, where she presents a series of public lectures on family relationships and the law.


(A: And then, this goes on about the rest of it:)


She was a member of the Jewish Leadership Council until 2010, was a Rhodes Trustee 1996-2006, and a founding Trustee of The Mandela Rhodes Foundation.


(A: Yadda, yadda, yadda, yah.  And:)


...the daughter of the late historian and journalist, Josef Fraenkel, who fled Vienna and then Prague....


Etc, etc.  So, they really get up there, the Communist Bunch.  And you think Communists are all poor people.  No.  They’re multi-billionaires, the Communists.  They don’t believe in equality for all.  That was all for you lot at the bottom to believe, so as you’d have revolutions for them that put them in power.  But here they are running your lives, and they’re all to do with abortion, bring down the population, tamper with your genes, make sure the children have their proper indoctrination, for the generation they’re bringing up, so they’ll protest whatever they’re told to protest.  And they’ll actually turn on folk, eventually, that will have children.  Especially the old-fashioned way.  You know.  Obvious, isn’t it?


What I’m saying here is that you can’t just take any little article, like the one I read at the very beginning, and go with it, or start arguing over it.  It’s meant for you to argue over. “Abortion safer than giving birth.”  It’s to get you involved in controversy.  And according to your indoctrination, you’ll pick one side or the other.  Back with more, after this break.


Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix.  And talking about that last article too, you must always remember this.  There’s nothing you can read out there, there’s nothing put out there that doesn’t have a political spin on it, an agenda to it.  Because, remember too, pretty well everything out there, whether it’s book form or newspaper form, was set up by the group, the Milner Group, that merged with the Rhodes Foundation, and became the Royal Institute for International Affairs or the Council on Foreign Relations, as they call the branch in America.  But they have the CFR all over the world now. And the whole of the European Union, at the top, they’re all members of it too.  And that one, at the European Union, was set up by George Soros.  So, here you have all the Communists, literally in bed with what you think are the so-called Conservative and Right Wing multi-billionaires or trillionaires, all working together to play with your mind and get you to demand what they want you to demand, or the children to demand the stuff for their time.  They work out centuries in advance what they want to be done. 


And they always get the public to demand what the elite want them to demand.  It’s very simple.  And give scary stories on things to terrify you, so that you’ll react, you see.  We don’t think, we react.  We don’t use reason.  We just simply react, emotionally, and we’re meant to be emotive you see.  And that’s why they keep us ignorant at school of logic and reasoning in any of the lectures.  At least for the ordinary people, anyway, that is.


Now, schools are now spying on obese children.  And this article here says:


Schools ‘spy’ on fat kids


(A: They’re using the word fat now to get you angry at them, you see.  It sounds awful.  But you say obese, it’s more like a medical thing.  But when they say fat, there’s nothing, there’s nothing you can read that doesn’t play with your head, you understand.  These guys are experts at it.  It says:)


Big Brother is joining the battle of the bulge.


A group of Long Island students will soon be wearing controversial electronic monitors that allow school officials to track their physical activity around the clock.


(A: Around the clock.  Hmm?)


The athletics chair for the Bay Shore schools ordered 10 Polar Active monitors, at $90 a pop, for use starting this spring. The wristwatchlike devices count heartbeats, detect motion and even track students’ sleeping habits in a bid to combat obesity.


(A: It’s actually to train everybody else to want one as well.  Definitely the moms and all that will want one.)


The information is displayed on a color-coded screen and gets transmitted to a password-protected Web site that students and educators can access.


(A: Oh, the pervs will have a great time hacking that one.  They’ll do it quite easily.  Someone will come up with something that will crack it for all the pervs to buy, a program, and they’ll find out where the children are.  Oh, this one is alone in the woods.  That’s awful handy.  But you can’t tell these idiots this kind of stuff.  You know, science is supposed to be our savior, you see.  This is the new god, the new priesthood.  And if it’s scientific, it must be good.  That’s how we see things.  We’re all trained that way.  It’s so easy to do.  So, it records their heart rate and different things as well.  And it says they’re already using it:)


The devices are already in use in school districts in St. Louis and South Orange, NJ — and have raised privacy concerns among some parents and observers.


But Ted Nagengast, the Bay Shore athletics chair, said, “It’s a great reinforcement in fighting the obesity epidemic.


(A: It’s an epidemic, like something you catch, eh?  It tells them:)


...in real time, ‘Am I active? Am I not active?’ We want to give [children]


(A: I always use the word children, because ‘kids’ dehumanizes you, and that was the Communist Agenda too; dehumanize the children until they’re objects.)


the opportunity to become active.”


The monitors are distributed by Polar Electro, of Lake Success, LI, the US division of a Finland firm.


(A: So, there you go.  Some of them have been used for two years in some of the schools, etc, etc.  And the:)


Teachers use hand-held computers to collect data from each student’s wrist monitor during class, then upload the information to the school computer system for storage and long-term tracking.


(A: And then you always get the bit that you think is standing up for you.)


But privacy advocates


(A: Who are these privacy advocates, and what good are they?)


and parents worry that schools are using electronic monitors in phys ed without families’ knowledge or consent.


“I didn’t even know it was going on, and I’m active in the school,” said Beth Huebner, of St. Louis.


Her son, a fourth-grader, wore a Polar Active monitor in class without her OK last fall at Ross Elementary School.


“We have gotten no information about the Web-site security or where the data will go,” Huebner said.


Well, who’s going to stop it?  It’s up to the parents to just, you know, get off their duffs, and all come together, and start protesting this at the school, and say, get rid of this junk, and training them like animals in Pavlovian technique, you see.  That’s all it is.  Never mind the stigma of wearing one, with all your classmates.  Hmm?  But they go ahead now.  Schools you see have to, it’s not education, it’s conditioning.  It’s indoctrination.  That’s what schools are for.  I hope you realize that.  That’s really what they’re for.  And now, the upper class schools, the Ivy League Schools, it’s a different story altogether, and they get a different education.  Just like Bertrand Russell said they would, when he wrote that sixty years ago, that they’ll be a different class, eventually a different species.  Well, it’s pretty well there.  It’s pretty well there. 


Now, getting back to the whole idea of Communism, or they call it Socialism now, and sometimes Liberalism, same thing.  Khrushchev referred to it in America as liberalism.  And psychiatry was a big tool.  And they really, really believed that Pavlovian techniques and all the behaviorists that came afterwards should be pushed to the top, to train all of society to be perfect in the ways that the rulers wanted them to be.  And psychiatry has always been a tool in eugenics as well.  Big tool.  They’re the guys that came out with the poverty gene and all that.  If you’re poor, you’ve got a poverty gene.  But the psychiatric group now, push to redefine mental illness.  That’s exactly what they did in the Soviet Union.  And it sparks revolt, it says.  Back with more, after this break.


Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt.  We’re Cutting Through the Matrix.  Talking about, again, eugenics, the Big Agenda.  And it’s quite easy to condition a whole bunch of children, with the right indoctrination, to go on to the next step when they grow up.  That’s why they always do it in advance.  You always grab the young.  That’s what Stalin said, Lenin said, Pavlov said, all the guys who were into it. Skinner.  All of them.  All the behaviorists, of course.  And the Communists, which worked hand in glove, because that was the ideal world, that Socialists imagined would come into being.  And they get rid of all the bad genes, as they kept saying.  They also used psychiatry as a science, even though it’s anything but, really.  It’s a lot of fancy words and names and pills.  There’s only two kind of pills they have in psychiatry.  It doesn’t matter about all the hundreds of brands and all the rest of it.  One of them will put you to sleep in different degrees.  Either euphoric, you know, easy going, all the way down to a coma.  And the other one will speed you up until you get a little bit more energy, until you’re actually manic on amphetamines.  That’s the two groups, regardless of all their fancy names and all the rest of it.  Anyway, it says:


Psychiatric Group Push to Redefine Mental Illness Sparks Revolt


(A: A big part of Communism and Socialism.  And they said years ago, at all the World Socialist Meetings, they would use Big Pharma.  They would use Pharma.  Pharma would become combined with the system of controlling the masses.  And they used that to the maximum in the Soviet Union, and in China as well.  Because they believe you’re an animal, and they say that too in all their writings, that man is an animal, and you can retrain him, you see.  And it doesn’t matter.  They’ll kill you trying to do it.  No kidding.  That’s how crazy they are.  They’ll kill you trying to change you.  Because it’s like a religion to them.  Man is just an animal and you can be retrained to believe and do and be what they want you to be.  So they used it with people who were dissenters in the Soviet Union.  Anyone who complained about any policy of government was called anti-government. 


And now they’re using the term here, since Bush Sr. was in, in fact.  That’s when they first used that term.  He was also the one to first use the term Communitarianism, which they’re using in Britain with all their projects there.  But they used psychiatry as well, and some of the definitions were incredible, what they locked folk up for life with and forced medication upon them.  And ECT, you know, shock treatment, and so on.  Like “inflexibility of opinion,” when they try to win you over.  “Don’t you think this is the greatest system on earth?”  “Well, I’m not too sure of that, you know.”  And zoomf.  “We’ll give him another fifty volts,” and away you went.  And so, here it is.  It’s all here folks.  They’ve already got half the children in school drugged here already, you know, hyperactive disorders and all the rest of it.  Anyway:)


An effort that promises to broaden the definitions of mental illnesses


(A: Here you go.)


is spurring a revolt among health-care professionals in the U.S. and the U.K.


(A: They’re working on this together.)


A panel appointed by the American Psychiatric Association is proposing changes to the industry’s guide for mental illnesses, which determines how patients are diagnosed and treated, and whether insurers pay for care. The new edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is scheduled to be published next year.


The draft is sparking a backlash among practitioners concerned the expanding mandate will increase the number of patients treated with drugs. The guide would loosen diagnostic criteria on some existing ailments and brand as mental disorders some common behaviors, including having temper tantrums three times a week or a lack of sexual arousal. The changes may spur unneeded and dangerous treatment of the healthy, said Allen Frances, a psychiatrist who helped write the current guidelines.


(A: Well, you know darn well, it’s going to go into paranoia against government and stuff like this.  It’s definitely going to go there.)


“Everyday disappointments, sufferings and eccentricities are being redefined as psychiatric disorders, and that could lead to medication treatment,” said Frances, a professor emeritus at Duke University who lives in San Diego, California. “This is expanding the boundaries of psychiatry.”


(A: No, it’s doing exactly what psychiatry was invented to do through Freud and all the other front men that were put out there to do this.  Have you ever read the history of Freud?  It’s fascinating.  You know, it’s a joke, really.  But he displaced God above his head and he concentrated it below the belt.  Everything had to do with sex, apparently, according to him.  And then his daughter, who I think preferred women, if you read her history, took over teaching children, supposedly, that had certain problems.  Every one she taught and tried to help committed suicide later on.  No kidding.  She became head of the World Psychiatric Association, and that’s why they pushed the Freudian Psychiatry.  So, everyday disappointments.  You get your tax demand.  And ohh, you know.  And you’re supposed to do it with a smile, you see.  If they put enough dope in you, you’ll smile at anything.  It says:)


In many cases, family doctors will use the new definitions to treat patients, Frances said by telephone. Pressure from drugmakers to use medications can combine with media representations to create “an epidemic,” he said. “Once primary care doctors and patients have the idea that they saw a certain condition on TV, it becomes real.”


(A: It’s true.  They get a lot of them from television as well.  And a lot of mothers will come in too.  “I saw it on television.  They said I should use this drug.”  And they actually tell the drug to use.  And then the teachers will have a ball too.  They can add that to children who ask questions that make them feel uneasy, you know.  So, it’s called:)


‘Medicalizing Normality’


The psychiatric group’s research director, characterized critics as being unconvinced medical treatment is better than counseling. The idea of “medicalizing normality comes from a perspective that there are no psychiatric disorders, and you need to avoid stigmatizing people by giving them one,” he said in a telephone interview.


An Oct. 22 letter critical of the changes, sponsored by units of the American Psychological Association in Washington, was signed by more than 10,800 people, including psychologists, psychiatrists, counselors, and community activists. The British Psychological Association, based in Leicester, England, sent a similar letter in June 2011.


The letters identify changes such as the one affecting ADHD, or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,


(A: Or a reaction from all the inoculations you got, it should say.)


a long- identified illness that involves hyperactive people who have difficulty staying focused and controlling behavior, according to the National Institutes of Health.


Etc.  So, they’ve got, again, I mentioned the original article, maybe at the beginning of the week or last week, to do with ADHD, and how they’re going to put it into different categories of it now so more and more folk can get included in it. 


Aren’t you happy with everything?  Don’t you watch television?  No, no.  Don’t you parrot television?  No, no, no.  Don’t you watch porn?  No, no.  Oh, jeez.  You’ve got that awful disorder there.  We’ve got pills for them.  And it’s all coming.  It’s all coming folks.  I’m not kidding.  You understand, Socialism and Communism are anti-individualism.  You cannot be different when the masses have all accepted whatever system has been given to them.  You can’t be different.  That’s what it’s based on.  The elite are terrified of individuals.  You never know, they might have an original thought that changes the world.  That’s what Mao Tse Tung said.  He wasn’t afraid of armies or anything else.  He says, I’m afraid of an original idea.  But, of course, you can go back to sleep and watch your games and all the rest of it after I’ve finished, or get terrified. 


Another part of this whole agenda too is to keep you in constant shock and terror, you see.  You can’t think straight when you’re terrified, about things.  Think about things calmly and logically and you understand them.  And then you’re not terrified.  You understand them.  Quite easy to do. 




LAPD: Joint Military Drills In Downtown LA


Joint military training exercises will be held evenings through Thursday, according to the Los Angeles Police Department.


The LAPD will be providing support for the exercises, which will also be held in other portions of the greater Los Angeles area, police said.


Training sites “have been carefully selected to ensure the event does not negatively impact the citizens of Los Angeles and their daily routine,” a department official said.


The training, which a department official said would involve helicopters, has been coordinated with local authorities and owners of the training sites, police said.


Police said safety precautions have been taken to prevent risk to the general public and military personnel involved.


(A: Military personnel involved.)


The exercises are closed to the public, police said.


The exercises are designed to ensure the military’s ability to operate in urban environments,


(A: That’s home environment, folks.)


prepare forces for upcoming overseas deployments, and meet mandatory training certification requirements, police said.


So, you know what’s coming down the pike, don’t you?  I’ve been saying this for years.  I mean, they’ve been building up an internal army for thirty years.  What do you think it’s for?  Go back to sleep then, eh.  What do you think it’s for?  I’ll tell you, even the bank crashes of 2008, that was all planned many, many, many, many years before.  It was time to bring in austerity.  The banks would lose nothing.  They gained.  Because we paid them all back, what they claimed they lost, which they didn’t lose.  It was just moved somewhere else.  All planned that way.  Everything is managed.  You’re not in a society that’s open to change through suggestion or demands, if you’re genuine.  The only ones who get demands met are the NGOs that are paid for by the big foundations, the tax-free foundations, that are owned by the big international bankers like George Soros, who says this, he says:


There is an upcoming class war in the US. 


'The situation is about as serious and difficult as I've experienced in my career.


(A: And this is a guy who’s a prime agitator for this whole New World Order idea of Socialism.  Multi-billionaire.  This is the guy too:)


He pocketed $1 billion


(A: More than $1 billion.)


betting against the British pound on “Black Wednesday” in 1992, when sterling lost 20 percent of its value in less than 24 hours and crashed out of the European exchange-rate mechanism. No wonder Brits call him, with a mix of awe and annoyance, “the man who broke the Bank of England.”


He actually boasted he phoned up two of his pals, and says, let’s do this.  And he got away with it.  He boasted about it.  This is the guy who funds the Color Revolutions across the world.  He’s got a whole bunch to go yet, in the Far East as well.  And he set up a headquarters in Burma as well to get them going.  So, this guy, think about it.  Why is he being allowed to go across the world creating groups?  You always get groups created so as they can fight each other.  It’s the first step you do.  These guys are masters.  They’ve been doing it for thousands of years, some of them.  And then you have to go in and take over, and get it back to stability and plunder them at the same time. 


So, I’ll put all these articles up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  If it’s up, by the way.  Last night it was pulled.  I don’t know if anybody noticed.  And I had to transfer everything to the other sites.  They said that there was going to be a twelve-hour maintenance.  I don’t know why.  Why didn’t they pull the other ones as well, and maintain them?  So, something is going on, right now, of course.  We know the laws have changed drastically, and that’s why I say, you should always get into cuttingthroughthematrix.com when you can, download what you want, when you can, because I’m sure they’ll pull them down the road.  Definitely. 


Megaupload got pulled, by the way.  They’re all up in court right now.  I’ll put that article up as well.  And there’s about five of them on the run they haven’t caught yet.  But they’re really pushing across the whole planet now for these guys.  And believe you me, the time will come when they’ll come for guys like me.  And they’ll put me on about half a dozen different pills, give me a little collar to wear that’ll show them where I am, and then they’ll call me every half hour.  How are you doing, Alan?  I’m feeling pretty nice, the world is just wonderful.  Have you had your pills?  Oh, yeah.  And you know.  And I’ll be one of you then, watching television.


So, anyway, I’ll put this link up with George Soros as well.  But that’s where the world is. 


And I’m also putting up tonight, a PDF on the last Convention on Biological Diversity, very, very, very important United Nations treaty that was signed.  And of course we find that Canada’s Maurice Strong, that’s not really Canada’s at all, he’s spent more time outside the country than in it, but he’s a front man for Rockefeller on all this stuff.  He was the head of the Rio Summit then.  And again, the next one is coming up shortly.  Out of that came Agenda 21, the Millennium Project, all these different projects all came out of that.  The Animal Corridors, the Super-Highways.  You can’t use rainwater that comes off your roof, etc.  It all belongs to the state or world, actually.  There’s always a corporation that seems to have rights over all that mind you, but that’s just the way it is.  So, I’ll put that one up tonight as well, and you can go through that, and see how it’s affected you and see how far it’s gone since they actually did it.  Again, a private organization, meeting privately, gets a treaty signed through the United Nations that affects all of our lives.  Nobody from the general public was invited to this meeting, or even knew it was going on, in 1992.  So, the next one, as I say, this year, is going to be a doozie, you wait and see, because they’re pushing more and more.


Right at Davos right now, at Davos in Switzerland, the World Economic Forum, or WEF – which is FEW backwards, it’s for the few stinking rich people – are actually talking about, oh, there’s just too many poor folk, you know.  As they sip their brandy and so on.  There’s just too many poor people.  We’ve got to rectify this situation, they say.  What they mean is taking more money off you to bring in austerity, in a post-consumerist society, as I’ve been saying for years, from their own articles.  From their own articles, folks.  Because we’re post consumerist now.  How do you do that?  You raise taxes on everything.  You take more taxes and you put it across the world, claiming to redistribute the wealth and so on.  Exactly what the Communists wanted.  Isn’t that strange, these multi-billionaires and trillionaires who are doing the same as the Communists?  Isn’t that rather strange, don’t you think?  After all, weren’t the Communists going to eliminate all the stinking rich aristocracy?  Wasn’t that what they said?  Oh, yeah, we’ll do that.  No, no, no.  That was only to get rid of the Russian bunch, not for the rest of the world or the Queen or any of that bunch. 


So, you’re living in a world of what you think are paradoxes.  Most folk won’t understand them, but that’s just the way it is, folks.  It’s really all here.  And your children are going to be a lot worse.  You won’t even recognize them. That’s what every generation says now, I don’t recognize what they’re getting taught in school, or where they’re getting these ideas from.  It’s an indoctrination process.  The children are being taught what they will protest, when the time is right, in about sixteen, seventeen years, twenty years down the road.  They will be turning, just like the Chinese, by the way, turn, on people who have more than one child in their village.  At one time, they sent the militia out to drag them off for abortions, if you had a second child.  Now they’ve trained them, and we’ve read the articles here a few years ago, now the public around you in the houses come out and drag the woman off themselves.  How’d they do that?  They made sure that generation got the proper indoctrination, then gave the order and away they went.  That’s how simple it is to train people.  So simple.  Scary isn’t it?  Scary.  We’re so simply trained.  Where does it all come from?  Watch television, again.  If you were to scan television, and a whole bunch of different stations, you’ll find the same buzzwords, the same little hints and nudges, as Sunstein calls them, in them all.  They’ll all come up, until you start parroting it yourselves into reality, to your friends.  Very simple.  Very, very, very simple.


And tonight too, I also want to mention another few articles if I can.  I don’t know if there’s time or not.  I might get one caller in after the break here.  The BBC News says that the EU, the Economic Union Parliament.  It’s an awful name, that.  Why don’t they just call it Europa or something?


The EU Data Protection Law proposals include large fines


They’re coming in.  I don’t trust this at all.  There’s something else behind it, because they’re going to give, supposedly, the citizen the right to pull all their stuff off the internet that’s been grabbed by the corporations.  Obviously not by the government.  They’ll keep it, but supposedly you’ll be able to take your stuff off.  There’s something else behind this.  Back with more, after this break.


Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix.  And there’s a caller there.  There’s Jane from Ontario on the line.  Are you still hanging on there, Jane?  Hello?


Jane: I am.  What I was going to talk about, you probably don’t have time for it, so I’ll just make a couple of comments on things you were talking about instead.  Well, I disagree, I think red wine is good for you.  That is one study that, um, I don’t care what you say, I believe it.  I think it’s good for you.  And, what else.  Oh, the thing about those monitors, those monitors for the chubby children.  They could also use them for the hyper children to make sure that they’re not too active.  And they could keep the chubby children active, more active, and the hyper children....


Alan: Do you know what’s wrong, Jane?  The fact is there’s too many people wanting to control everybody else.  I’ll tell you one thing, when I was young, I ran everywhere.  I ran everywhere.  I ran to school.  I ran three miles to school every day.  I enjoyed it.  And doing that sort of stuff, I could sit in school.  If I didn’t run, I couldn’t sit still.  And that’s how young boys are.  Healthy young boys can’t sit still unless they get rid of their energy.  The schools all know this.  And they’ve always known it for well over a hundred years, that young boys naturally climb trees and chase each other, and they burn it off.  That’s why you used to give them lots of sports.  Well, they stopped all that.  And they want them to be like little girls now.  And so, they drug them and dope them.  And it doesn’t have to be done by a psychiatrist.  It’s the darn teachers, who want them to be sitting there like zombies, you see.  And this is what they’re doing.  Because young boys, if their mind is not interfered with, become leaders.  And if you want people who stand up and say, I’m not having this, this is wrong.  Who’s got leadership qualities.  And the rest, see the rest just follow the leaders, you see.  Then you simply eliminate that class by drugging them.  And that’s why they’re doing this.  This is part of the agenda.


Jane: I know.  I was just being facetious.


Alan:  I know.  I know.  But that’s what’s wrong.  That is what really is wrong.  And you understand, individuality is not a welcome thing these days.  And they’ve trained the public, and the public themselves, they get the public to turn against the individuals in society.  And that’s a sad thing.  Very, very sad.


Jane: You know, the thing about children, the thing about, you know, it’s not good for women to have children and all that baloney.  People do, like, if you have a large family, I had four children, and a lot of times, when you were out with the children, people would really, you know, give you a dirty look, because you had too many children.


Alan: I’ve heard other folk say the same thing, especially now.  In fact, some people have come up to people I know and told them that, you know.  I mean, that’s how you train the idiots.  Just like Sunstein said, you can contaminate people who then become your tool.  They don’t know it.  They become tools, for a cause that they didn’t even choose themselves.  They think they did, but they didn’t.  And they come up and say, “Oh, you’re taking so much of the earth’s resources up.”  Look at the money they spent on the guys at the meeting at the G20 in Toronto.  It was into the billions of dollars, building fake towns for them and fake lakes and all that stuff, so as they could have their big fat lunch.  And they’re talking about us having too many children?  But again, you see, most folk can’t reason.  That’s the problem.  They can’t reason.  They just get emotionally involved and angry.  You’ve got to get reason, and you’ve got to stop getting angry, and think about things.  Thanks for calling.


From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.



Topics of show covered in following links:

Researcher of Red Wine Falsified Data

More Anti-Human Propaganda

Brave New World for "Equality"--Radical pushes Ectogenesis"

From IVF to Immortality

Schools Spy on Obese Children

Psychiatric Group Pushes to Broaden Definitions of Mental Illness

LAPD--Joint Military Drills in Downtown LA

Soros on Coming US Class War

Megaupload Shut Down

Convention on Biological Diversity--UN

Billionaires at Davos Bemoan Income Equality

EU Bill Proposes Right to have Personal Data Removed from Net


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"